By Paul Kane, Ben Pershing and William Branigin
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, July 29, 2010; 6:15 PM
excerpt:
The 13 counts included those allegations, plus charges that Rangel violated the code of providing faithful government services, House rules on soliciting donations and franking rules. He was also accused of multiple violations of a ban on receiving gifts.
Specifically, the investigative subcommittee found that Rangel broke multiple House rules in his efforts to create and fund the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at the City College of New York, including provisions governing gifts to members and use of official resources for unofficial activities. The probe showed that Rangel frequently solicited donations from lobbyists and companies with interests before his Ways and Means Committee.
ad_icon
The ethics panel reported that Rangel asked his congressional staff to produce "a list of potential donors to the Rangel Center. The work was done on property of the House of Representatives, on official House time and with the use of official House resources." Rangel also sent letters on congressional letterhead to potential donors, along with a brochure requesting a gift of $30 million, or $6 million per year for five years.
The report also outlines Rangel's dealings with Eugene Isenberg, the chief executive of Nabors Industries. Isenberg and his company pledged a combined $1 million to the Rangel Center, the subcommittee said, and in subsequent meetings Isenberg and Rangel discussed "the retroactivity of tax provisions related to inverted companies" -- a change in tax laws that would benefit Nabors.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... id=topnews
If this is true, I think he should have resigned before it came to this.

