neonzx wrote:http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm
snip,(j) The term “religion” includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that he is unable to reasonably accommodate to an employee’s or prospective employee’s religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business.
Thanks. It looks to me like a clause that is being stretched beyond its reasonable limits. I imagine that for decades this has been interpreted to mean such things as providing ways for an employee to observe religious holidays. However, it never extended to such things as requiring employers who provide cafeterias to provide Halal or Kosher kitchens, or permitting Sikhs to wear their beards and carry their knives in the armed services. An anti-choice employee of Pfizer gained no right to demand that Pfizer stop developing and selling birth control pills. This looks to me like an attempt by the anti-choice crowd to extend this requirement for reasonable accommodation far too far.

.